Jason Fields is a deputy opinion editor at Newsweek, an author, and co-host of the Angry Planet podcast. A war will start between the two great world powers and it will last for a period of 27 years. I mean, that's involving Africa, that's involving Asia, United States. That doesn't mean everybody's rich don't take me to be saying that, but it's not the same thing as some of the poorer African countries where grain prices are spiking and people are already starting to go hungry.
And when I think about a world war, it's not just prices here in some ways the United States is better prepared to deal with things like that, simply because we're richer than other places. I think that that is part of the problem, and what my piece was trying to get at in some ways: it's a huge gray area. New research predicts that in the aftermath of a nuclear war, crop production will be severely impacted. Stock image of a nuclear bomb mushroom cloud. help, does that mean you're at war? If someone dies because you turned off the power somewhere and they were on life support, are you at war? What I am saying is that you have to realize what's actually going on, because we're also talking about cyber conflicts, right? When you actually knock someone's generators offline, or if you knock off someone's centrifuges, like Israel did in Iran with U.S. I'm not saying there's necessarily a problem with that. That means that indirectly, the United States is actually killing Russian kids. The United States is actively sending weapons to people in Ukraine. I think that's really the biggest question right now. I think that we don't know whether it's gonna go from cold to hot. What does it mean to be at war? If it's not someone directly attacking your economy, directly attacking the whole world? I mean, the actual bodies are in Ukraine, but the rest of us are suffering along with it. Prices are actually going up in the United States continually for basic staple goods. My worry is more whether we're actually in a war right now - it's a slow moving war, in a sense.
0 kommentar(er)
